<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Nada importante sucedio hoy...</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/en/</link><description>Weblog sobre entrepreneurship, tecnología e innovación y capital de riesgo.</description><item><title>Webinar archives: Engage and Innovate with Challenges and Challenge.gov</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/910/</link><description>Webinar archives: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howto.gov/training/classes/engage-and-innovate-with-challenges&quot;&gt;Engage and Innovate with Challenges and Challenge.gov&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:30:48 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/910/</guid></item><item><title>MapLight - revealing money's influence on politics</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/909/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://maplight.org/&quot;&gt;MapLight&lt;/a&gt; - revealing money's influence on politics</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:28:27 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/909/</guid></item><item><title>Interesting stuff in the Journal publishing reform about open journals, etc. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/908/</link><description>Interesting stuff in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Journal_publishing_reform&quot;&gt;Journal publishing reform&lt;/a&gt; about open journals, etc. Focused on Math, but may be inspiring for other sciences too! Other relevant reading is the Research Works Act of 2011 (H.R. 3699)</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:18:00 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/908/</guid></item><item><title>MIT Technology Review: Undermining China's Monopoly on Rare Earth Elements. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/907/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/26980/&quot;&gt;MIT Technology Review&lt;/a&gt;: Undermining China's Monopoly on Rare Earth Elements. See also the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.energy.gov/news/documents/criticalmaterialsstrategy.pdf&quot;&gt;Critical Materials Strategy&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) report.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:25:34 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/907/</guid></item><item><title>Congratulations! :)  Kay Awarded IBM Center Funds</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/906/</link><description>Congratulations! :)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iac.gatech.edu/news-and-events/story?id=4432&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Kay Awarded IBM Center Funds&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:55:44 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/906/</guid></item><item><title>Return of blood samples to Brazilian tribes</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/905/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/5523/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Return of blood samples to Brazilian tribes&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:52:03 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/905/</guid></item><item><title>U.S. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/904/</link><description>U.S. Businesses Report 2008 Worldwide R&amp;D Expense of $330 Billion: Findings from New &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf10322/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NSF Survey&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:16:06 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/904/</guid></item><item><title>Interview with Harold Varmus in Seed Magazine: "The impact factor is a completely flawed metric and it’s a source of a lot of unhappiness in the scientific community."</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/903/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/&quot;&gt;Interview with Harold Varmus&lt;/a&gt; in Seed Magazine: &quot;The impact factor is a completely flawed metric and it’s a source of a lot of unhappiness in the scientific community.&quot;</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:06:14 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/903/</guid></item><item><title>There should be limits to the collection of personal data: Please explain: why Google wants your Wi-Fi data</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/902/</link><description>There should be limits to the collection of personal data: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/please-explain-why-google-wants-your-wifi-data-20100513-uyyh.html&quot;&gt;Please explain: why Google wants your Wi-Fi data&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:55:18 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/902/</guid></item><item><title>TechCrunch: "Remember Those Red Darpa Balloons? We Helped Find Three Of Them"</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/901/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/11/red-darpa-balloons/&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Remember Those Red Darpa Balloons? We Helped Find Three Of Them&quot;</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:01:39 -0300</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/901/</guid></item><item><title>Senators Introduce "Start-Up Visa" Legislation</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/900/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entrepreneurship.org/PolicyForum/Blog/post/2010/02/25/Senators-Introduce-Start-Up-Visa-Legislation.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Senators Introduce &quot;Start-Up Visa&quot; Legislation&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:27:15 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/900/</guid></item><item><title>The other way around? This is another (very interesting) example of civil technologies that find military application. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/899/</link><description>The other way around? This is another (very interesting) example of civil technologies that find military application. &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=9272180&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Why Does the Air Force Want Thousands of PlayStations?&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:39:25 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/899/</guid></item><item><title>In  Wired: Google Introduces Real-Time Search. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/898/</link><description>In  Wired: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/google-introduces-real-time-search-google-goggles/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Google Introduces Real-Time Search&lt;/a&gt;. Looks great... see it in action &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?esrch=RTSearch&amp;tbs=rltm%3A1&amp;tbo=u&amp;hl=en&amp;q=twitter&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. It would be nice to have the same feature for Google Shopping!</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:03:46 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/898/</guid></item><item><title>DARPA Network Challenge
</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/897/</link><description>&lt;div class=&quot;titulo&quot;&gt;DARPA Network Challenge&lt;/div&gt;
The recently announced &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;DARPA Network Challenge&lt;/a&gt; sought to explore &quot;the roles the Internet and social networking play in the timely communication, wide-area team-building, and urgent mobilization required to solve broad-scope, time-critical problems&quot;. The challenge was to locate ten moored red weather balloons located at ten fixed locations in the continental United States, offering a $40,000 prize reward for that. The competition took place on December 5th. These are only some thoughts on the challenge, drawing upon some sources I recently read.
How would was the incentive to compete? Well, I do remember very enthusiastic comments from some participants (unfortunately, I did not save all the links to those websites—&lt;a href=&quot;http://findtheredballoons.com/2009/12/we-won/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is just an example). Beyond the interesting focus of the prize from the sponsor's research point of view, it is interesting to see how a simply defined prize target and, probably most importantly, $40K attracted so many people to the competition--4,000 participants as reported in &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/DARPA_News&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/DARPA_News&lt;/a&gt; ( @DARPA_News on Twitter ) or about 300 teams as cited in &lt;a href=&quot;http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/01/2139419.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt;. For regular people, $40K is good money, particularly in crisis time—and the costs of participating do not seem to be so high. However, I do not think that the extent to which participants considered this an achievable target or participated for other reasons is known (and this may be an important aspect when designing the right incentives in prizes). DARPA may have collected more information on this.
@DARPA_News reported that the competition leveraged the effort of at least 4,000 participants (o details on how those participants contributed to achieving the prize target or about their activities). The same source reported only 120 submissions for the position of the balloons by 1:31pm on Dec 5th; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://balloon.media.mit.edu/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;MIT Red Balloon Team&lt;/a&gt; was announced winner when there were only 30 minutes left before grounding the balloons that day. I did not find any comment on the MIT team website about how they worked to win the competition. But I did find something very interesting about how they tried to engage more people to participate. They implemented &lt;a href=&quot;http://balloon.media.mit.edu/mit/payoff/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a scheme&lt;/a&gt; to share the prize reward based on the people participation: those who provide correct data on the location of balloons and those who invite them to participate would share the prize reward with the MIT team.
For sure, the competition has had different outcomes. In principle, DARPA has successfully attracted (again) the attention of the media and lots of people. Moreover, I really would like to read about how successful the collection of data for their experiment was. That was the primary goal of the competition. Probably not all participants benefited from their participation, yet some of them have probably learned more about their interests or how to apply their knowledge for other purposes related to the prize challenge. Surely, networking between participants has been another outcome.
Did the prize challenge look simple, yet it was too difficult to achieve? Well, in principle, there was a winner, so the challenge was achievable (I do not know the specifics on the needed technologies). From the point of view of the sponsor’s goals, it looks that the target was well defined, considering that the prize challenge was achieved with only few minutes left before the competition deadline! In other words, that probably had elicited the greatest possible effort from the participants.
Overall, this is another interesting case that shows how prizes can be used for very different purposes and engage lots of people in the meantime.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:17:26 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/897/</guid></item><item><title>Increasing access to public data is being replicated at the local level as well: NYTimes: Local Governments Offer Data to Miners</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/896/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.data.gov/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Increasing access to public data&lt;/a&gt; is being replicated at the local level as well: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/technology/internet/07cities.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NYTimes&lt;/a&gt;: Local Governments Offer Data to Miners</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:14:51 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/896/</guid></item><item><title>Pending since some time ago: Barack Obama Loves Startups: New Federal Office for Early-Stage Entrepreneurs</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/895/</link><description>Pending since some time ago: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/readwritestart/2009/09/barack-obama-loves-startups-ne.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Barack Obama Loves Startups: New Federal Office for Early-Stage Entrepreneurs&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:34:43 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/895/</guid></item><item><title>On the topics of this blog
</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/894/</link><description>&lt;div class=&quot;titulo&quot;&gt;On the topics of this blog&lt;/div&gt;
If this is the first time you visit this blog, you first need to know that it has been very difficult to keep the site updated. I started the blog in 2004, when I was still living in Santa Fe, Argentina. The blog was very active during its first two years of life, but then, in 2006, I moved to Atlanta, GA to start my Ph.D.... I has spent a lot of time in front of the computer since then, but no time for blogging though.
You will see that &quot;Blog on entrepreneurship, technological innovation and venture capital&quot; (at the top of the page) still reflects the main contents of this blog in its early days. I am still interested in those topics (indeed, my research is related to those topics) but the blog now has a much broader coverage (and it is bilingual, partly to keep an archive of all the Spanish content already created).
Hopefully, I will continue writing on those topics, so come back regularly if you share the same interests. In particular, I may share some thoughts on the topic of my dissertation, inducement prizes and their effect on technological innovation (which is even more interesting!)</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:11:59 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/894/</guid></item><item><title>A short article about the process of creating a new company has been recently published by Nature: Start up and succeed. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/893/</link><description>A short article about the process of creating a new company has been recently published by Nature: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/2009/091126/full/nj7272-530a.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Start up and succeed&lt;/a&gt;. For those that do not have too much knowledge about the process, it is interesting. It is oriented toward scientists who want to create a company, so it includes a few paragraphs on university spinoffs.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:57:21 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/893/</guid></item><item><title>ScienceWorksForUS has data on stimulus research projects across the US and profiles with money invested and research organizations for each state.</title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/892/</link><description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceworksforus.org/&quot;&gt;ScienceWorksForUS&lt;/a&gt; has data on stimulus research projects across the US and profiles with money invested and research organizations for each state.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:32:49 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/892/</guid></item><item><title>I did not check it in detail yet: Time Magazine published a list of top-50 inventions of 2009 along with some related stuff too. </title><link>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/890/</link><description>I did not check it in detail yet: Time Magazine published a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/0,28757,1934027,00.html&quot;&gt;list of top-50 inventions of 2009&lt;/a&gt; along with some related stuff too. You may find some interesting things there.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:26:58 -0200</pubDate><guid>http://www.nadaimportante.org/es/890/</guid></item></channel></rss>

